
While all of the different film formats may seem daunting at first, its really quite easy. In understanding film formats, all you need to remember is two principles. The first, is that bigger is always better. And the second, that smaller is easier.
To make a print, your image must be enlarged from the original negative. A 35mm negaitve, for example, is approximately 1.5 inches by 1 inch. Medium format (also known as 2 1/4), is some 3-5 times bigger than 35mm. And large format, starting at 4x5, is some 14 times bigger than a full 35mm frame. So why does medium and large format look so much better than 35mm? Its very simple. Since its bigger, it doesn't need to be enlarged as much. That's it.
So the resolution of your print depends on the enlargement factor -ie, how much you blowup the original. An 8x10 chrome, for example, doesnt even need to be enlarged at all for an 8x10 print because its already some 8 x 10 inches in size. A 35mm negative however, would need to be enlarged almost 60 times to make that print, while a 6x7 neg would only be enlarged 13 times. But, for a 1 inch sized print, a 35 mm frame would look just as good as that 8x10 neg would. So remember: resolution is only relative to the final print size you need.
However, with size, you pay a big price. Larger film is more expensive, the equipment heavier, slower, and usually less versatile. Certain subjects are near impossible for the bigger formats. With Large Format, you must shoot and load one piece of film at a time. That's why 35mm is usually appropriate for fast paced action environments, while Large Format is really only suited for slower, very controlled setups that the photographer controls. Medium format is popular because it straddles somewhere in between the two, providing both quality and versatility.

| Format | Area (approx) | Times bigger than 35mm |
| 35mm | 1 sq" | - |
| 645 | 4 sq" | 2.7x |
| 6x7 | 6 sq" | 4.5x |
| 4x5 | 19 sq" | 14x |
| 8x10 | 79 sq" | 59x |
| Print: | 35mm | 645 | 6x7 | 4x5 | 8x10 |
| 5x7 | 26x | 9x | 6x | 1x | - |
| 8x10 | 59x | 22x | 13x | 2x | 1x |
| 11x14 | 114x | 41x | 25x | 8x | 2x |
| 16x20 | 237x | 86x | 51x | 17x | 4x |
| 20x24 | 356x | 130x | 77x | 25x | 6x |
| 30x40 | 890x | 324x | 192x | 63x | 15x |
So, once again, size is king, whether film or digital. The bigger the sensor, the better the overall quality. The only real difference is that per square inch, digital is actually superior to film. It's been proven that digital sensors smaller than their film counterparts actually outproduce bigger pieces of film. For example, the full 35mm frame of the Canon 1ds has image quality comparable to medium format film -even though it is some 2.5 x smaller than a 645 neg. Likewise, the 645 frame of the Phase One 22 MP H25 acts much like a 4x5 piece of film. Thus, digital sensors seem to "jump" ahead into the next category of quality. To learn more about digital photography and what kind of image quality you can expect, please goto: The Digital Advantage: Why Digital Has Caught Up To Film.